Fact Finder: Law Enforcement Sharing Services Watch Video Read Comments
ADVERTISEMENT
Photo

Does Traverse City need police and sheriff services?

By Diana Fairbanks
Tuesday, October 20, 2009 at 1:39 p.m.

Read more: Local, Crime, Politics, Economy, Grand Traverse, Traverse City, Officers, Police, Sheriff, Diana Fairbanks, Fact Finder, Fact Finder

Everyone is trying to find ways to work smarter and spend less, including local governments.

We've told you about the City of Cheboygan's discussions about possibly letting the county sheriff's office take over for the city police department.

That got a viewer wondering about law enforcement in Traverse City. She wondered the city needs both.

We take a closer look at the issue in tonight's Fact Finder report.

At the most basic level, both are required by law: the sheriff's department by the state constitution and the city police department under the city charter. The sheriff's office does have some specific duties like operating a jail and providing security for the court, but most of their day to day operations differ only by geography.

Grand Traverse Sheriff Tom Bensley says, "city officers patrol in the city and handle complaints and activities in the city and our officers are doing basically the same thing in the county."

And since they share the same basic job, sharing a the tools to make it happen is not out of the ordinary.

Traverse City Police Chief Michael Warren says "we have a common central dispatch, common central records, common evidence room, our detectives are all housed in the same wing of the building."

And it's been this way for more than 25 years. In 1983 Chief Warren says a confederation plan brought all of these things together, but stopped short of completely combining forces.

Chief Warren says, "there was an attempt at that point to integrate patrols, but citizens didn't support it, unions didn't support it."

Making that change today would be a big change. Sheriff Bensley says the two departments are not staffed proportionately. He says the city has more officers per capita than the county.

Sheriff Bensley says, "if the county wanted to staff the city at the same level as the county is, they'd lose about half of their police officers."

Chief Warren says staffing is the sticking point in any discussion to combine services. That includes the final report on law enforcement by the citizen's advisory panel COFAC.

"in his last statement when he presented his final report to the Traverse City Commission is that we do not intend to cut the number of officers patrolling Traverse City. He didn't differentiate whether those had to be county officers or city officers, but he did say the numbers within the city should remain the same."

But some people are asking for change. Last night at the city commission meeting there was renewed discussion about whether city residents are getting their fair share in county law enforcement services. Some argue that city residents pay more in taxes than they see in county officers. City commissioners are planning to ask the county to renegotiate the terms of their shared law enforcement agreement. But commissioners have tabled that official request until after the November election.

What do you think about this?  Is this the best way for the city to spend its law enforcement dollars?  Leave your comments below.

SPONSORED CONTENT
3 Comments on this Story
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them; they are not reflective of the views or opinions of Barrington Broadcasting, TV 7&4, its directors or employees. If you believe a comment violates the Barrington Terms of Use, please report it here.

Keep the Traverse City Police

Posted by Karl Childers, TC - Wednesday, October 21, 2009 at 7:27 p.m.

As a longtime city resident I support keeping the city police. Along with the city commission, we have more say over what type of a department we have for our community. The sheriff's office can see a change every election. The election may not reflect the needs of our community, the city. The Traverse City Police Department is a very well run and professional organization. Traverse City is also a very safe place to live. Let's keep them both that way!

City Taxpayer

Posted by Bill Ptak, Traverse City - Wednesday, October 21, 2009 at 2:00 p.m.

Both the police and fire departments should be combined with the county Sheriff's dept and the Metro Fire Department to save taxpayers money and make the entire police and fire systems more efficient. The cost effectiveness would be increased considerably and the coverage could be the same if not better. City taxpayers are subsidizing the township police and fire departments and getting very little in return.

Don't compromise our safety for numbers.

Posted by Safety First, Traverse City - Wednesday, October 21, 2009 at 7:03 a.m.

Why in the world would people want to lay off police officers? Sure, Traverse City may not be the most dangerous place in the world, but there are problems and crimes that need to be handled. There have been more break-ins reported since the economic downturn. I live near the downtown area; there have been domestic and business break-ins all around. Let's not forget, as well, that pizza delivery person who was robbed right on the street. So what if we have to pay a little more for security? I'd rather have a few less pretty street signs than less officers patrolling those streets.

"What motivates the Man to act? Bread, right? Like everything else it's really a question of economics...the settlement of all questions, the solutions to all issues are determined not by what will make the people most healthy and happy in their bodies and their minds but by economics." Tom Robbins, "Another Roadside Attraction", describing the United States government.

News
ADVERTISEMENT

PopularCommented


CONSUMER INFO