Fact Finder: Jail Expansion Plans Watch Video Read Comments
ADVERTISEMENT
Photo

Grand Traverse County Looks to the Future

By Diana Fairbanks
Thursday, August 20, 2009 at 1:36 p.m.

Read more: Local, Crime, Grand Traverse County, Jail, Bensley, Diana Fairbanks, Fact Finder, Fact Finder

Four years ago Grand Traverse County spent about 2 million dollars to expand the jail.

So a viewer wanted to know why there's already talk of expanding it again, or even building a new jail?

The answer is tonight's Fact Finder report.

Grand Traverse County Sheriff Tom Bensley says, "The County put an addition on the jail four years ago when it was overcrowded and that helped the situation greatly, but we can't expect the situation to stay the same."

The issue of crowding has long been a hot topic for county jails where state law places a cap on how many inmates can be housed at a facility forcing counties to make some tough decisions when there is not enough room.

But with the addition of 42 beds in 2005, that's not a problem today at the Grand Traverse County Jail.

Sheriff Bensley says, "Currently we have no population problems. The jail capacity is 194 and this morning we have 166."

But county and jail leaders are planning now for the future.

Sheriff Bensley says, "We would expect there to be at some point in time an increase and we cannot build a new jail overnight."

One factor that may speed up the need and the process is a cost cutting proposal in Lansing. Sheriff Bensley says the plan would allow courts to sentence offenders up to 2 years in county jails. Right now inmates can only spend up to a year in jail, any longer sentences must be served in state prison.

Sheriff Bensley says, "That helps the state people out but puts it right back on the county. If that were to happen we'd see a large increase in jail population."

While that proposal is still in the early stages, the sheriff says this is the time to start thinking about the possibilities.

Sheriff Bensley says, "We need to start talking about when and where a new jail would be constructed. There are a lot of factors involved with that. #1 is primarily the location and #2 is cost."

When it comes to location, the sheriff says where the jail is now has its pluses and minuses.

Sheriff Bensley says, "There are advantages to being at the Boardman campus with all of the courts there. There may be some disadvantages or limitations with space and parking and also incorporating the sheriff's office back to the Boardman Campus."

Right now the jail is downtown nestled between the recently renovated courts and the governmental center. The sheriff's office though is located more than a mile away on Woodmere Avenue. Another possibility is to building a new facility on county owned property on La Franier Road.

That option would allow for expansion and re-uniting the jail and sheriff's office, but it would be miles away from the courts.

Expanding the jail at its current location would likely mean going up instead of out. If the nearly 50 year old foundation can handle it.

These are all long term possibilities planners will explore, along with the cost, which the sheriff says is too early to estimate.

But he says if the jail runs out of room, there are only two short term options.

Sheriff Bensley says "the options are early release, let inmates out early, or board them at other facilities and that costs money."

The sheriff says to avoid those options; looking toward tomorrow should start today.

Sheriff Bensley says, "Why do we start now? It's something the county has been talking about in that we need to plan for the future. It will be a long process if a new jail is needed in five years this process may very well take five years."

So what do you think about plans to expand or build a new jail? Would you pay more in taxes to help cover the cost?

Leave your comments below.

SPONSORED CONTENT
14 Comments on this Story
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them; they are not reflective of the views or opinions of Barrington Broadcasting, TV 7&4, its directors or employees. If you believe a comment violates the Barrington Terms of Use, please report it here.

!

Posted by Tim McConnal, Traverse City - Tuesday, August 25, 2009 at 7:35 p.m.

People should ask themselves if the crime committed was a violent act/crime or not. A case of force or fraud.

I bet there would not be one half of the people in jail now if there where not bogus laws to bring down nonviolent people/offenders.

A person that does not harm anyone else has not committed a crime.

To the person that wrote the coments from a taxpayer

Posted by Dennis Bliss, McMillan, Michigan - Tuesday, August 25, 2009 at 3:23 p.m.

The jails keep the people who commit crimes away from people who don't. It sounds like you believe that all these people should be free to roam around and do what ever they want to do. The comment about sex offenders being way down on the list is false also. Just the past four months the state has paroled 44 sex offenders and one murderer. There have been at least two cases that I know of that women have been raped and beatten by two of the parolees. Sometimes I you people live in some other place then in this world where you have people who kill and hurt people all the time and all you have to say is we are spending too much money on jails to keep them in. You think that all the police and prison gaurds watching these people want it to protect there jobs. I would like just once for you people out there to work two weeks with the people in prisons or in jail and see what it is like to be spit on and pissed on and yelled at and then to protect you people and get answers like this one.I wish the govenor and her staff would pull the duty too and see what really happens. They go to the prisons and get an escort and protected from all that stuff. Let them work one day and see what happens. The state is intent on giving these prisoners more rights inside then the guards watching them. You should be happy that there are people out there wanting to work in these places no matter what it costs.

TRAVERSE CITY CITIZEN/TAX PAYER/MOM

Posted by Erin Rhead, Traverse City - Monday, August 24, 2009 at 4:29 p.m.

I don't think the citizens of Traverse City realize just how much crime there is in this fine city. Way too many criminals are released early now as it is to control the jail population. Keep these criminals off our streets, out of homes, and away from our children. How much would you pay to know they are behind bars and not prowling through your neighborhood. I say expand the jail as much as needed to house these felons. The officers that protect our city/county are not given enough credit for the jobs they have to perform. How many of the public would like to take care of these felons on a day to day basis? Not many. So hats off to our law enforcement and correction officers. And EXPAND THE JAIL!!!!!

pay to stay

Posted by A Viewer, Traverse City - Monday, August 24, 2009 at 2:35 p.m.

Instead of having the tax payers contribute the funds needed for the jail expansion, maybe the daily fees assessed to each prisoner needs to be increased. Why should the innocent pay to house the criminals? Make the prisoners pay for their stay in the jail. If they can't afford the housing costs there, maybe they should plan on staying out of the jail in the first place.

all americans are Terrorists?

Posted by Barry Laughlin, Harbor Springs, MI - Monday, August 24, 2009 at 7:08 a.m.

according to Homeland Security every american Is a potential- Terrorist...No Exceptions, unless you're member of Fourth-Rich, Skull-&-Bones, or KKK... so face it...amerikkka's DONE Son...Need I Say more?

Comments

Posted by A. Taxpayer, Traverse City - Saturday, August 22, 2009 at 10:57 a.m.

First, those inmates who are being released are eligible for parole. Sex offenders rank way down the list on being paroled.
Second, an area jail was explored and not a viable solution.
Third, a couple of jails in the area were overbuilt to handle the overflow from Grand Traverse County and the County has a contract with them for beds whether they are used or not.
Fourth, there is no room to expand the jail downtown. This is not open for discussion so the new proposed jail would have to be build somewhere else and arraignments would be done by using close circuit cameras. Not a big deal.
Fifth, with the aging population in Michigan there is discussion as to how much crime will increase in the near future. Remember all the schools that were overbuilt 20 years ago? Now they are closing them. All of them are underused.
Sixth, at over $40.00 a day to house a prisoner, are you willing to be taxed more for taking care of them?

Remember, a new jail will cost between $20 and $30 million dollars and that is just the start. You will have to staff a new jail, pay for upkeep and maintenance so a $20 to $30 million dollar figure is just the start.
For those who want a new jail, prepare for new and higher taxes because the sky is the limit.
Will a new jail really give you that warm fuzzy feeling knowing you will be completely safe?
This talk of a new jail gives law enforcement job security so doesn’t plan on hearing anything negative from them. Just scare tactics.

Governor's doing

Posted by Dennis Bliss, McMillan, Michigan - Friday, August 21, 2009 at 8:16 p.m.

The facts for the expansion is that the governor in her wisdom is letting out all these people on parole and withing weeks they are back in jail. They have left out 4400 so far and 2500 are back in jail for parole violations. They closed the prisons to save money and now put it on the communities to keep the prisoners. If we only had a plan??????

expansion

Posted by billy bob, traverse city - Friday, August 21, 2009 at 12:57 p.m.

Stop filling the jail up with minor charges like smoking a joint. I wonder how many people are in there for small amounts of marijuana? give them a ticket or a citation and let them be on there merry way. that will free up some space for the hardcore criminals. But thats just my opinion and the Government won't leagalize weed cause they have no way to profit from it.

Well

Posted by John Doe, Mesick - Thursday, August 20, 2009 at 11:34 p.m.

We have all these prisons that are closing why not get a large group of counties together and fund one of those and put the you extras there

No more taxes!!!

Posted by J King, Traverse City - Thursday, August 20, 2009 at 11:18 p.m.

Living in Traverse City my taxes are already sky high. I know what happend to the extra $600 that I paid this year, it went to pay for an officer to drive around town and tear down garage sale signs. If the jail needs to expand try getting funding from the state!

A new jail?

Posted by A. Taxpayer, Traverse City - Thursday, August 20, 2009 at 10:00 p.m.

The sheriff should try and remember or ask the highly touted Blue Ribbon Committee that spent over a year debating a new jail. Even with a stacked "Blue Ribbon Committee", a new jail was not recommended although some did try and shove it down the throats of other committee members.
I can see the voters of Grand Traverse County approving a 30 million dollar jail in our economic condition, can’t you?
Plan on another tax increase along with one for the roads, sewer fiasco, fire department and God only knows what next.
Damn, those public officials sure know how to spend our money, don't they?

VIOLENT OFFENDERS

Posted by S MORRIS, TRAVERSE CITY - Thursday, August 20, 2009 at 3:46 p.m.

to the above comment. After several failed attempts to rehablitate violent sex offenders, who keep repeating their crimes against children, where should we put them. I have an idea..with the people who would vote no. People need to realize that some criminals cannot be rehabilitated....

jail expansion plans

Posted by bob kesling, ludington - Thursday, August 20, 2009 at 3:17 p.m.

Instead of every county having to build new jails every few years. It may make more sense for five or six countys to house there inmates at a facility like the one in mason county "camp sable" that is now closed.And pay a monthly fee per inmate.That facilty could be privotly run witch tends to be more cost efective.

no

Posted by barbara b, traverse city - Thursday, August 20, 2009 at 3:17 p.m.

i would NOT pay add'l taxes or approve it in a vote to build a bigger jail. How about trying to rehabilitate offenders rather than put them in jail?

News
ADVERTISEMENT

PopularCommented


CONSUMER INFO