Fact Finder: Trooper Driving Restrictions Watch Video Read Comments
ADVERTISEMENT
Photo

How The State Budget is Impacting Local Patrols

By Diana Fairbanks
Tuesday, July 14, 2009 at 1:56 p.m.

Read more: Local, State, Economy, Crime, Trooper, Miles, Driving, Budget Cuts, Diana Fairbanks, Fact Finder, Fact Finder

As the state tries to balance its budget, many departments are being asked to make cuts and do without.

That includes the State Police.

Officers are now limited on how many miles they can drive in an effort to save gas and save the state money.

A viewer wanted to know how troopers are meeting these new mileage restrictions and still doing their jobs.

The answer is tonight's Fact Finder Report.

State police troopers travel our streets and highways patrolling and investigating crimes.

But these days' troopers are driving less and parking more.

Lt. Elliot says, "We were basically told 3 months ago we had to reduce the miles we drive our patrol cars by 25%."

For the Traverse City post, that means driving about 70,000 fewer miles this year.

Starting last month, a trooper working out of the Traverse City Post is now limited to an average of 55 miles for an 8 hour shift, or just over 1,300 miles a month covering Grand Traverse, Leelanau and Benzie Counties.

But Lt. Elliot says it's key to remember this is only an average.

Lt. Elliot says, "it's not like they hit their miles and their day is over, that's not the case at all. They are still responding to all emergency calls. People need to understand even with the mileage restrictions we're still there we're just doing things a bit differently than in the past."

So what are they doing differently?

More stationary patrols, more intersection enforcement, and more investigations that start at the post.

Lt. Elliot says, "if there's not a desperate need for us to go to the scene if someone has a criminal complaint they'd like to make and there isn't any scene to process they can come to the post and that reduces our travel somewhat."

So while they are finding ways to reduce travel, they are not necessarily reducing their daily workload, but there may be bigger concerns on the horizon.

Diana asks, "Do you find it's hindering your ability to fight crime?" Lt. Elliot replies "I don't think it hinders it. The thing you can't measure is how much are we deterring crime? Not being mobile, not being able to be around the county as much. I can't really say how much of an impact that's having. Now common sense would tell you that if you're not able to get out into some of those remote areas there maybe some things happening there that are undetected."

He says, since the new limits have only been in place for about a month now, it's too soon to examine the broader effects. So for now, they are hard at work, figuring out a new way to work.

Lt. Elliot says "the bottom line is we're doing the best we can with restrictions we have. The guys are being pro-active and still responding to emergency calls it's just that we have to do things a little differently"

The current mileage restrictions are for this fiscal year which ends in September. But Lt. Elliot admits with the current state of the economy he's not sure when the restrictions might be lifted. He says the restrictions for northern lower Michigan are projected to save the state about 400 thousand dollars.

So what do you think about this? Have you noticed a difference in patrols? Do you think this is a good way to save the state money, or is it a dangerous and short sighted plan?  Leave your comments below.

SPONSORED CONTENT
9 Comments on this Story
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them; they are not reflective of the views or opinions of Barrington Broadcasting, TV 7&4, its directors or employees. If you believe a comment violates the Barrington Terms of Use, please report it here.

Read the article again

Posted by Kim Concerned, TC - Monday, July 20, 2009 at 3:40 p.m.

To you who think that it is 10-15 mph over the speed limit. It is 10 - 15 miles driven. Big difference. For those of you who post, get a dictionary, and don't post in all caps, I can't stand the screaming.

"Trooper Driving Restrictions"

Posted by Bill Perault, Cheboygan - Friday, July 17, 2009 at 2:15 p.m.

I think it is ok, after all I would think being ready to answer a call of crime is better than driving around showing people you are there to try to detour crime that really has been increasing anyways. Plus why spend state money for just show? You know a hillbilly said something smart once to me, sometimes it is better to sit and wait then to go looking. Like an allagator, they are pretty efficient animals and they usually survive quite well.

WRONG PLACE

Posted by JOHN BAKER, TRAVERSE CITY - Friday, July 17, 2009 at 8:39 a.m.

WHY DONT THEY START CUTTING TRAVEL EXPENCES FOR THE FAT CATS IN LANSING? WE PAY FOR THE STATES WORST GOVERNER IN HISTORY TO TRAVEL TO CHINA TO BRING BACK JOBS.WHAT A WAIST THAT WAS.I WONDER HOW MANY TROOPER MILES THAT COULD BE.ALL THE TRIPS TO MACKINAW ISLAND SHE GETS,AND A FULL TIME STAFF SHE KEEPS,YOU NEVER HERE ABOUT CUT COMMING FROM THE PLACES THAT COULD AFFORD SOME CUTS,INSTEAD THE CUT FROM POLICE PROTECTION,EDUCATION,HUMAN SERVESES,CORRECTIONS MEDICADE.I FOR ONE THINK A STATE TROOPER ON THE ROAD IS MUCH MORE EFFECTIVE AT SLOWING TRAFFIC AND PREVENTING DRIVER HAZZERDS THAN A TROPPER SITTING ON THE SIDE OF THE ROAD SOME WHERE. LANSING REALLY NEEDS TO DO THERE JOBS,IF THEY CAN,AND START LOOKING INTO SOME OF THE MONEY WASTED IN ALL THESE STATE RUN AGENTCES,LIKE THE SECRETARY OF STATE OFFICE IN MY TOWN,THEY HAVE 15 TOP NOTCH FLAT SCREEN COMPUTERS AND ONLY THREE TO FOUR PEOPLE WORKING IN THE OFFICE 52" FLAT SCREEN T.V.HANGING ON THE WALL SHOWING LITTLE SERVES ANOUSEMENTS.AND YOU AND I BOTH KNOW THAT IS'NT EVEN SCRATCHIN THE SURFACE OF WASTED TAX DOLLARS.I THINK ITS TIME WE START GETTING PEOPLE IN THESE GOVERMENT OFFICES THAT CAN MAKE SOME DECISIONS THAT WILL HELP THE PEOPLE OF THE COUNTRY NOT JUST THE GOVERMENT EMPLOYES.THEY SHOULD BE WORKING FOR US NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND.

I Agree

Posted by Charles Merchant, Ocqueoc - Wednesday, July 15, 2009 at 7:51 p.m.

Firstly, I agree that any police officer is doing a job I would not be willing to. The schedules, paperwork, and clientele are not what I would choose to deal with.
However, I agree with the point that perhaps the State Police would be best used as the high end resource agency. In my personal experience, with four stops by State Troopers over the past 3 years, three were for the crime of not wearing a seat belt, with the most recent for the safety issue of having a crack in my windshield. Neither of these affect anyone but me, so I am apparently helping to pay for their presence to save me from myself. I would be much happier to see my tax dollars helping to fund needed assistance with genuine crime solving efforts.
Until our elected officials realize the burden they create for all taxpaying citizens needs to be reduced so we can spend to grow the economy, our future looks bleak indeed.
G I T P N T S.

Speeding?

Posted by Joe Citizen, Traverse City - Wednesday, July 15, 2009 at 9:21 a.m.

Hmm...there are less officers on the road...the complaint numbers are up...and you wonder why they go 10-15 MPH over the limit? Geez. Let me think about this.... OH. Maybe it is because they have less officers on the road, more complaints. People should think before they post.

What's the Difference

Posted by Fred Nelson, Traverse City - Wednesday, July 15, 2009 at 8:54 a.m.

If being restricted to 55 miles per shift is a 25% reduction in driving, what is the difference. It would appear that a trooper was only driving about 75 miles per shift before. This equates (given where they usually drive) to about tow hours of road patrol before the mileage cut. We would be better off if the MSP were reduced to an investigative and high-end supprt unit, and leave road patrol to the local sheriffs and police.

Trooper Driving Restrictions

Posted by A Northern Michigan Citizen, Northern Michigan - Wednesday, July 15, 2009 at 5:21 a.m.

Less troopers on the road, more criminals out of prison all due to the same budget cuts and early release. Now, local budgets are straied as city and county officers pick up the slack answering calls for service. Recidivism rate will show that offenders will probabaly offend again creating "more calls for service." The officer that now "passes you," without lights on could be on a complaint where a victims' personal safety is in question. The next time you see an officer, ask him/her how many complaints they handle in a year and you'll be suprised. My hats off to the handfull of peacekeepers left to pick up the slack.

Troopers driving

Posted by Jeffre Kelts, Boyne City - Tuesday, July 14, 2009 at 11:40 p.m.

I think before the police are put on a budget, the government employees should take a paycut. Not just close the Secretary of State a few days, but every Government employee including Govenor Granholm, State Reps, Congress, ect. Also, all of the office employees who work for them, should take a 10% pay cut. That would be huge and look like the Michigan Government care about it's people. Actually, why not do this for the whole country start with the President down to local Governments.

Speed Limits??

Posted by jenna modean, yooper - Tuesday, July 14, 2009 at 5:20 p.m.

Why shouldn't law enforcement officials drive by the same regulations that are forced upon us? I drive at speed limits and get passed by every state trooper vehicle that comes up behind me. That would be a good gasoline saving recommendation. Why do they continually drive at least 10-15 miles over the limit with no emergency situation?

News
ADVERTISEMENT

PopularCommented


CONSUMER INFO